Interview: The Afghanistan Mess (audio)

“Middle East scholar Dr. Stephen Zunes talks about how U.S. imperial hubris helped create, and continues to deepen and intensify the deadly chaos in Afghanistan. “The war not only was raised some moral and legal questions, but it has not resolved the situation, it has made matters worse. The problem is that there has been a gross oversight on the military side of the equation. The really important issues have been overlooked.”

Audio File:
http://www.couragetoresist.org/x/images/stories/audio/zunes.mp3

The U.S. and Afghan Tragedy

Foreign Policy In Focus/IPS  February 18, 2009
By Khushal Arsala, Emily Schwartz Greco, Stephen Zunes  [source] One of the first difficult foreign policy decisions of the Obama administration will be what the United States should do about Afghanistan. Escalating the war, as National Security Advisor Jim Jones has been encouraging, will likely make matters worse. At the same time, simply abandoning the country — as the United States did after the overthrow of Afghanistan’s Communist government soon after the Soviet withdrawal 20 years ago — would lead to another set of serious problems. http://www.fpif.org/reports/the_us_and_afghan_tragedy

Holbrooke: Insensitive Choice for a Sensitive Region

Foreign Policy in Focus, January 30, 2009
Obama’s choice for special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, arguably the most critical area of U.S. foreign policy, is a man with perhaps the most sordid history of any of his largely disappointing foreign policy and national security appointments. Richard Holbrooke got his start in the Foreign Service during the 1960s, in the notorious pacification programs in the Mekong Delta of South Vietnam. This ambitious joint civilian-military effort not only included horrific human rights abuses but also proved to be a notorious failure in curbing the insurgency against the U.S.-backed regime in Saigon. https://www.ourcampaigns.com/NewsDetail.html?NewsID=55930
https://www.ashevilleglobalreport.org/articles/holbrooke-insensitive-choice-for-a-sensitive-region

Pakistan’s Dictatorships and the United States

Foreign Policy In Focus/IPS December 12, 2007
In his 2005 inaugural address, President George W. Bush declared that the United States would support democratic movements around the world and work to end tyranny. Furthermore, he pledged to those struggling for freedom that the United States would “not ignore your oppression, or excuse your oppressors.” Despite these promises, the Bush administration—with the apparent acquiescence of the Democratic-controlled Congress—has instead decided to continue U.S. support for the dictatorship of General Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan’s president. http://fpif.org/articles/pakistans_dictatorships_and_the_united_states

Operation Enduring Freedom: A Retrospective

Foreign Policy In Focus, By John Feffer, Stephen Zunes | October 17, 2006
It has become a given, even among many progressive critics of Bush administration policy, that while the U.S. war on Iraq was illegal, immoral, unnecessary, poorly executed, and contrary to America’s national security interests, the war on Afghanistan–which was launched five years ago last week–was a legal, moral, and a necessary response to protect American national security in the aftermath of 9/11…