No Iranian threat ‘other than having US regional interests challenged’

Al Jazeera June 22, 2025 [source], 3-minute video,
also World News, Virtual Jerusalem, Israel Insider, Ticker:
Stephen Zunes, the director of Middle Eastern studies at the University of San Francisco, says the suggestion that Iran posed any kind of threat to the US is “totally nonsense”. “Iran has no capabilities of reaching the United States with its missiles or other kinds of weaponry… And if the concern was about their nuclear programme eventually being militarised to make nuclear weapons, Trump would not have destroyed” the 2015 nuclear deal, Zunes added.

He argued the attacks were not about any kind of Iranian threats “other than that threat of having a major power that could challenge US interests in the region”. Asked why he thought Trump decided to attack Iran now, Zunes replied: “I have a feeling he’s been wanting to launch war on Iran for some time, frankly.” He added that this was “obviously” contrary to what Trump had campaigned on, but added that “it should not be that big of a surprise” because the Republican president “has broken any number of campaign promises” on both foreign and domestic issues.

How could Iran respond to US attacks?

We have spoken to Stephen Zunes, the director of Middle Eastern studies at the University of San Francisco, and here’s how he sees the Iranian response to the US attacks playing out:
“They have a number of options… They can attack US forces directly. There are up to 40,000 Americans within the range, not just of Iranian missiles but of drones and other weaponry… You have the fleet in the Persian Gulf, just off the Iranian coast. They can be vulnerable as well if they attack… it could impact global shipping, impacting oil prices and indeed the entire global economy… You also have proxy militias in Iraq who could target American bases there… So there are a number of ways that American forces could be vulnerable, and I would be surprised if the Iranians don’t target at least some of these.”

The fallout of Trump’s Iran strike

The Daily Star, Dhaka, Bangladesh, June 22, 2025 (quotes Zunes):
According to Stephen Zunes, director of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of San Francisco, Iran, too, “has a number of options” at its disposal. “They can attack US forces directly. There are up to 40,000 Americans within range, not just of Iranian missiles but of drones and other weaponry. The fleet in the Persian Gulf, just off the Iranian coast, is also vulnerable to Iranian attacks, and that could impact global shipping, oil prices, and indeed the entire global economy.” The proxy militias in Iraq could also “target American bases there.” And so, there are “a number of ways that American forces could be vulnerable [and it would be surprising] if the Iranians don’t target at least some of these.”
  However, as surprising as it may be for Iran to back down, that may be its best option. Following Israel’s devastating success in eliminating Iran’s top leadership in the surprise attack on June 13, the conflict has taken some shocking turns…

Interviews: More Iran War articles: June 17-22

No Iranian threat ‘other than having US regional interests challenged’
DazzlingDawn.com June 22, 2025: Stephen Zunes, head of Middle Eastern studies at the University of San Francisco, dismissed the notion that Iran poses any real threat to the United States as “completely absurd.” He told Al Jazeera, “Iran lacks the missile range or military capacity to strike the US.” Zunes further argued if the concern were genuinely about Iran’s nuclear program potentially being weaponized, then former President Trump wouldn’t have withdrawn from the 2015 nuclear agreement. He believes the motivation behind the attacks has little to do with any direct threat from Iran and more to do with the country’s potential to counterbalance US influence in the region…

How will Iran retaliate against the US?
RadioFree.org June 22, 2025 [source link is no longer accessible]:
When asked why Trump chose to attack Iran at this point, Zunes speculated that “he’s probably been eager to start a conflict with Iran for a while now.” Although this move contradicts Trump’s original campaign promises, Zunes noted it’s not entirely unexpected, pointing out that Trump has reversed course on many pledges—both in domestic and foreign policy…

Global Reaction: A Region on Edge
CoastalDigest.com June 22, 2025: Analysts believe the U.S. move might entangle it in a long-term conflict. Stephen Zunes, a Middle East expert at the University of San Francisco, said Iran has several “painful” options at its disposal and warned of a broad regional backlash…

US bombs Iran’s nuclear sites: What we know so far
And DNYUZ.com: Stephen Zunes, the director of Middle Eastern studies at the University of San Francisco, laid out several options available to Iran in response to the US attacks unfolding. “They can attack US forces directly. There are up to 40,000 Americans within the range, not just of Iranian missiles but of drones and other weaponry,” he said. “You have the fleet in the Persian Gulf, just off the Iranian coast. They can be vulnerable as well if they attack,” Zunes said, using another name for the Gulf, which is also referred to as the Arabian Gulf. “It could impact global shipping, impacting oil prices and indeed the entire global economy.” Zunes also pointed towards the “proxy militias in Iraq who could target American bases there”, adding that he would be “surprised if the Iranians don’t target at least some of these”…

Media Sanctuary Radio interview: Stephen Zunes
June 18 on the war Israel launched with Iran
& June 17 on Israel, Iran and the US:
Israel launched an unprovoked military attack on Iran. While they claimed that they were acting to destroy Iran’s imminent effort to develop nuclear weapons, both the US and Israel for decades have claimed that Iran was on the precipice of developing such a capability. Israel of course already has nuclear weapons. The Iranian official who was negotiating over the nuclear program with the US was one of many murdered by Israel. While President Trump claims he did not give the green light to Israel’s attacks, the US has been ramping up its military support for Israel as Iran has responded to the attacks, threatening the possibility of an all out regional war. Trump has urged people to flee Tehran and has raised the possibility of assassinating Iran’s leader, though he did reportedly recently veto such an effort by Israel. Professor Stephen Zunes, Director of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of San Francisco, talks to Mark Dunlea of Hudson Mohawk Magazine…

Israel-Iran conflict: Analysts say US likely to take direct military action
CNA June 18, 2025: Channel News Asia, a Singapore -based, owned by Mediacorp
“Calling for the unconditional surrender of a sovereign nation state is pretty extreme. We haven’t heard that rhetoric very often,” noted politics professor Stephen Zunes from the University of San Francisco. “It has really sent some shock waves and is making people think that this is not just going to be a series of strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities, but something much bigger.” He pointed to how Israel’s military and Trump have urged residents to evacuate from Iran’s capital city of Tehran, which has a population of more than 9 million. “There, indeed, could be a much bigger war, and the United States itself might get involved,” Zunes said…

SUBSTACK ARCHIVE REPOST JUNE 22, 2025 (7-minute audio) of Zunes’ 2020 article challenging the myth: “After bombing Iran, Trump’s claim Iran was responsible for 1,000 American deaths in Iraq is a lie…”

Interview: Trump Bombs Three Nuclear Sites in Iran

Civic Media Breaking News Jnne 21, 2025
[24 mins., also on Facebook and YouTube]
Civic Media carried a special report Saturday evening, anchored by Todd Allbaugh and joined by Stephen Zunes, a professor of politics and international studies at the University of San Francisco. He serves as founding director of the school’s Middle Eastern Studies Program, and is widely-regarded as one of the country’s leading scholars on U.S. Middle East policy.

“Since Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal, they’ve not been limited in terms of reprocessing, so they have developed isotopes to a point where they could go in that direction within a couple years,” said Zunes. “But the idea that this was some kind of imminent threat that required military action at this time is nonsense. Not just because they could simply go back to the Iran Nuclear Deal, but even without that, they’re some time away from that…”

We Know They Lied about Iraq’s WMDs, but It Gets Worse

The Progressive July 13, 2016: The thousands of American casualties, trillions of dollars of expenditures, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi casualties, and the rise of sectarianism, terrorism, Islamist extremism, and the other negative consequences have been disastrous. But even worse, even if Iraq really did have the proscribed “WMDs”, delivery systems, and weapons programs, the war would have still been illegal and unnecessary. Here’s why…

The Budget’s Foreign Policy Handcuffs

Foreign Policy In Focus/IPS March 20, 2009,
by Emily Schwartz Greco, Stephen Zunes [source]
Hopes that a Democratic administration with an expanded Democratic congressional majority might lead to a more ethical, rational, and progressive foreign policy were challenged with last week’s passage of the 2009 omnibus budget bill, which included many troubling provisions regarding the State Department and related diplomatic functions. http://www.fpif.org/articles/the_budgets_foreign_policy_handcuffs