Trump’s Deal with Iran is Good Enough

The Progressive, June 23, 2026: [click here for audio and text]
The Memorandum of Understanding signed between the United States and Iran is indeed a better deal for the Islamic Republic than the 2015 JCPOA and what could have been agreed to prior to the war, but it is probably the best that is realistically attainable at this point. I note how Democratic politicians and others who denounce it as a “surrender” while unable to suggest a practical alternative are effectively calling for more war. Please consider circulating.

4 Talks: Iran, Israel, Palestine

    * June 14, 2026, First Unitarian Universalist Society of San Francisco on “U.S. Policy towards Israel/Palestine: How We Can Change It”
    * May 23, 2026, “Universities’ Acquiescence to Trump Administration Policies and Implications for Academic Freedom,” for the Peace & Justice Studies Association
    * From a seminar organized by the Arab Organization for Human Rights in which I made a short presentation on U.S. support for the repressive Sisi regime in Egypt
     * April 22, 2026, a conversation with Robert Malley, a key figure in recent Democratic administrations involved in negotiations with Iran and with Israel & Palestine, and Daniel Zoughbie of the Institute of International Studies at the University of California-Berkeley

20 Interviews: May-June 2026, Iran related

Below are links to various radio, television, and podcast interviews about the U.S., Iran, and related issues during May and June 2026:

    * A 28-minutes with David Swanson’s Talk World Radio
    *  A 20-minutes with Kris Welch on KPFA-FM, starting at 38:40
    * Hour-long interview for the Scholars Circle on the war
on Lebanon with Yeghia Tashjian and Ervand Abrahamian
     *  Two recent segments for an Indian network news show:
     June 18, beginning at 5:20 & June 2, starting at 4:25
     *  On a Singapore television news channel
     *  On a Singapore radio news channel
 * Two short interviews on KPFA-FM News, Pacifica:
June 14, starting at 2 mins. & May 24, starting 2:28    

* For KTVU News (one of the Bay Area network affiliates):
        June 18: https://ktvu.com/video/fmc-sv3bvh10vi4mon19.amp
        June 8:  https://bit.ly/3RVvpr6
        June 7:  https://bit.ly/43n9zze
        June 1:  https://bit.ly/43UizvR
       May 28:  https://bit.ly/4egHjmR
       May 25:  https://bit.ly/3QcXklR
       May 19:  https://youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=J7tH8nNmCJI&ra=m
       May 13: https://bit.ly/43p5U3R
       May 9: https://archive.tveyes.com/18120/531666-150162/dfd53d40-1c93-45d8-9a79-ad2dd615c0c5/KTVU_04-20-2026_16.30.43.mp4

 Also, two much older analyses were depressingly prescient:
     * A 50-minute documentary from 2012 in which I and a dozen other scholars and analysts critique the U.S. threat of War with Iran: https://youtube.com/watch?v=yoITyAobBMI
     * A 2006 interview I did with Foaad Khosmood on U.S. policy towards Iran and the possibility of war: https://znetwork.org/znetarticle/a-shift-in-iran-policy-by-stephen-zunes/

Quoted in Wyoming Star: Operation Epstein Fury Parts 13 & 14. Iranian Red Lines.

June 24, 2026: “It is not going to be smooth sailing, but my sense is that the Trump administration recognizes that there is too much at stake for it to fail. The MOU is being attacked as a bad deal, as being worse than the JCPOA, and worse than what they could have gotten Iran to agree to prior to the launch of the war and Iran recognizing the power it had to disrupt the global economy – all of which are true. It is nevertheless likely the most realistic alternative at this point.
Israel will try to sabotage the deal, but Trump, unlike previous US presidents, does not have an ideological commitment to Israel. His approach to foreign policy is purely transactional…”

 June 10, 2026, “Trump has made it clear to the Israelis that a full-scale resumption of the bombing would be unacceptable, but he is apparently willing to support a low-level war indefinitely. Meanwhile, Israel is expanding its occupation of the Gaza Strip to close to 70% of the territory in violation of the ceasefire agreement and with the apparent support of the Trump administration. Occasional air strikes, with additional civilian casualties, continue as well. And, in the West Bank, settler militias, in ways comparable to the rightwing death squads in Central America during the 1980s, continue to terrorize the Palestinian population with the acquiescence of the Israeli government and, extension, the US government.”
“There was some real hope a few weeks ago with news of a memorandum of understanding between US and Iranian negotiators, with the apparent support of the Arab Gulf states, Turkey, and Egypt. Trump rejected it, however, because it would involve unfreezing illegally withheld Iranian assets and would allow Iran to continue reprocessing limited amounts of uranium, similar to the 2015 nuclear deal that Trump has repeatedly condemned. Even the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz would be hard to depict as a victory since it had been fully open prior to the war.”
On Lebanon: “It is hard to imagine Iran agreeing to reopen the Strait without a comprehensive ceasefire and possibly an Israeli withdrawal from occupied parts of the country. Israel’s decision to expand its occupation [was] to increase pressure on the Lebanese government, even though it is essentially powerless to control Hezbollah…. Most political factions in Israel either support Netanyahu’s actions or believe he should escalate.”

Interview: Israel and Hezbollah Agree to US-Brokered Pause in Hostilities

Channel News Asia (CNA) Singapore, June 2, 2026, 14 min.: Israel and militant group Hezbollah have accepted a US proposal to pause hostilities. US President Donald Trump persuaded Israeli and Hezbollah leaders to de-escalate, after Iran threatened to end indirect peace talks with the US. For more on the latest, Susan Ng and Hairianto Diman speak with Stephen Zunes, Professor of Politics, University of San Francisco.

On Iran, Trump Has Backed Himself — and Much of the World — Into a Corner

Truthout May 5, 2026: The same kind of US hubris that led to the tragic wars in Vietnam and Iraq is manifesting itself with Iran today. U.S. efforts to force an end to the stalemate in the Strait of Hormuz by attempting to escort a few U.S.-flagged ships through the Iranian closure will not only fail to relieve the worsening global fuel crisis and disruption of supply chains, it risks a resumption of full-scale war. The Trump administration has rejected Iran’s suggestion for negotiating an end to the blockade followed by a resumption of talks on other outstanding issues, insisting that Iran first agree to eliminate its nuclear program.