Bipartisan US Push Tries to Label Democratic African Government as “Terrorist”

Truthout, August 2, 2025, By Stephen Zunes [podcast & source]
The UN treats the Polisario as the legitimate representative of the Western Sahara people. Washington’s designation of armed groups as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO) has always been politicized, but it may now reach a new level of absurdity thanks to a bipartisan resolution in the U.S. House of Representatives introduced by Joe Wilson (R-South Carolina) and Jimmy Panetta (D-California), targeting the Frente Polisario, the government of Western Sahara, officially known as the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. Morocco, an important U.S. ally, invaded Western Sahara in 1975 on the eve of its independence from Spain and currently occupies nearly 80 percent of the territory…

Video: What are the chances of a Gaza ceasefire deal soon?

CNA (Channel News Asia) July 6, 2025 (9 mins.)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said July 6 he hoped an upcoming meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump could “help advance” a Gaza ceasefire deal, after sending negotiators to Doha for indirect talks with Hamas. Stephen Zunes, professor of politics and director of the Middle Eastern studies program at the University of San Francisco, discusses on CNA’s Asia First why he believes a lasting ceasefire in Gaza remains unlikely.
CNA.Asia & CNA YouTube channel

Did Washington Post amplify Moroccan propaganda?

African Digital Democracy Observatory/
Disinfo.Africa quoted Zunes June 27, 2025:
Washington Post echoes disputed claims that Saharan mercenaries were captured in Aleppo: “On April 12, 2025, the Washington Post published a story describing the new Syrian government’s alleged efforts to dismantle illicit Iranian supply lines running through southern Syria… largely to aid Hezbollah in their war against Israel [and] implicated soldiers from an Algerian-based nationalist movement in the Iran-Hezbollah conspiracy. [But] this TruthAfrica investigation shows, the central pieces of evidence for these allegations appear to be a distortion of an Algerian ambassador’s statements and an inauthentic document… Steven Zunes told Truth Africa, “The Hezbollah/Iran connection is utter nonsense… The idea that [The Polisario Front] would be lying with this autocratic, reactionary Shia group,’ he told us, ‘just seems quite absurd….”

The fallout of Trump’s Iran strike

The Daily Star, Dhaka, Bangladesh, June 22, 2025, [source]
[Quoting Stephen Zunes] According to Stephen Zunes, director of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of San Francisco, Iran, too, “has a number of options” at its disposal. “They can attack US forces directly. There are up to 40,000 Americans within range, not just of Iranian missiles but of drones and other weaponry. The fleet in the Persian Gulf, just off the Iranian coast, is also vulnerable to Iranian attacks, and that could impact global shipping, oil prices, and indeed the entire global economy.” The proxy militias in Iraq could also “target American bases there.” And so, there are “a number of ways that American forces could be vulnerable,” and it would be surprising “if the Iranians don’t target at least some of these.” [source]

Interviews: More Iran War articles: June 17-22

No Iranian threat ‘other than having US regional interests challenged’
DazzlingDawn.com June 22, 2025: Stephen Zunes, head of Middle Eastern studies at the University of San Francisco, dismissed the notion that Iran poses any real threat to the United States as “completely absurd.” He told Al Jazeera, “Iran lacks the missile range or military capacity to strike the US.” Zunes further argued if the concern were genuinely about Iran’s nuclear program potentially being weaponized, then former President Trump wouldn’t have withdrawn from the 2015 nuclear agreement. He believes the motivation behind the attacks has little to do with any direct threat from Iran and more to do with the country’s potential to counterbalance US influence in the region…

How will Iran retaliate against the US? [source]
RadioFree.org June 22, 2025: Content originally appeared in The Progressive.
When asked why Trump chose to attack Iran at this point, Zunes speculated that “he’s probably been eager to start a conflict with Iran for a while now.” Although this move contradicts Trump’s original campaign promises, Zunes noted it’s not entirely unexpected, pointing out that Trump has reversed course on many pledges—both in domestic and foreign policy… An agreement signed a decade ago could have prevented today’s war, had Trump not pulled out of it in his first term.

Global Reaction: A Region on Edge
CoastalDigest.com June 22, 2025: Analysts believe the U.S. move might entangle it in a long-term conflict. Stephen Zunes, a Middle East expert at the University of San Francisco, said Iran has several “painful” options at its disposal and warned of a broad regional backlash…

US bombs Iran’s nuclear sites: What we know so far
And DNYUZ.com: Stephen Zunes, the director of Middle Eastern studies at the University of San Francisco, laid out several options available to Iran in response to the US attacks unfolding. “They can attack US forces directly. There are up to 40,000 Americans within the range, not just of Iranian missiles but of drones and other weaponry,” he said. “You have the fleet in the Persian Gulf, just off the Iranian coast. They can be vulnerable as well if they attack,” Zunes said, using another name for the Gulf, which is also referred to as the Arabian Gulf. “It could impact global shipping, impacting oil prices and indeed the entire global economy.” Zunes also pointed towards the “proxy militias in Iraq who could target American bases there”, adding that he would be “surprised if the Iranians don’t target at least some of these”…

Media Sanctuary Radio interview: Stephen Zunes
June 18 on the war Israel launched with Iran
& June 17 on Israel, Iran and the US:
Israel launched an unprovoked military attack on Iran. While they claimed that they were acting to destroy Iran’s imminent effort to develop nuclear weapons, both the US and Israel for decades have claimed that Iran was on the precipice of developing such a capability. Israel of course already has nuclear weapons. The Iranian official who was negotiating over the nuclear program with the US was one of many murdered by Israel. While President Trump claims he did not give the green light to Israel’s attacks, the US has been ramping up its military support for Israel as Iran has responded to the attacks, threatening the possibility of an all out regional war. Trump has urged people to flee Tehran and has raised the possibility of assassinating Iran’s leader, though he did reportedly recently veto such an effort by Israel. Professor Stephen Zunes, Director of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of San Francisco, talks to Mark Dunlea of Hudson Mohawk Magazine…

Israel-Iran conflict: Analysts say US likely to take direct military action
CNA June 18, 2025: Channel News Asia, a Singapore -based, owned by Mediacorp [source]
“Calling for the unconditional surrender of a sovereign nation state is pretty extreme. We haven’t heard that rhetoric very often,” noted politics professor Stephen Zunes from the University of San Francisco. “It has really sent some shock waves and is making people think that this is not just going to be a series of strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities, but something much bigger.” He pointed to how Israel’s military and Trump have urged residents to evacuate from Iran’s capital city of Tehran, which has a population of more than 9 million. “There, indeed, could be a much bigger war, and the United States itself might get involved,” Zunes said…

SUBSTACK ARCHIVE REPOST JUNE 22, 2025 (7-minute audio) of Zunes’ 2020 article challenging the myth: “After bombing Iran, Trump’s claim Iran was responsible for 1,000 American deaths in Iraq is a lie…”

Interview: Trump Bombs Three Nuclear Sites in Iran

Civic Media Breaking News Jnne 21, 2025
[24 mins., also on Facebook and YouTube]
Civic Media carried a special report Saturday evening, anchored by Todd Allbaugh and joined by Stephen Zunes, a professor of politics and international studies at the University of San Francisco. He serves as founding director of the school’s Middle Eastern Studies Program, and is widely-regarded as one of the country’s leading scholars on U.S. Middle East policy.

“Since Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal, they’ve not been limited in terms of reprocessing, so they have developed isotopes to a point where they could go in that direction within a couple years,” said Zunes. “But the idea that this was some kind of imminent threat that required military action at this time is nonsense. Not just because they could simply go back to the Iran Nuclear Deal, but even without that, they’re some time away from that…”

US Policy Toward Israel/Palestine Under Trump

Americans for Middle East Understanding, April 27, 2025
The Trump administration will certainly take a more hardline policy in support of Israel’s right-wing leadership and in opposition to Palestinian rights. Given President Biden’s strident support for Netanyahu’s wars on Palestinian and Lebanese populations, which had already isolated the United States in the international community, the shift in policy will probably be less dramatic than on practically any other major political issue.

France to Break Away from UK and US While Recognizing Palestine as a Nation State

Inter Press Service, UN April 18, 2025, Quoted by Thalif Deen [source]
    “Dr. Stephen Zunes, Professor of Politics and International Studies at the University of San Francisco, who has written extensively on the politics of the UN, told IPS it is rather bizarre that State Department spokesperson Bruce would bring up Hamas, which is a rebel Palestinian group openly challenging the internationally-recognized government of the Palestine Authority (PA), in a question about recognition of the state of Palestine.
    And the PA, he pointed out, had nothing to do with the October 7 terrorist attacks. It is revealing, however, that she emphasized the so-called Abraham Accords, which are designed to get Arab states to unilaterally recognize Israel instead of doing so in return for Israel ending the occupation and allowing for an independent Palestine, which has historically been the position of Arab governments.
    Putting Bruce’s bizarre response aside, however, the Trump administration’s policy is not that different from that of the Biden administration. Biden, like Trump, opposed any recognition of Palestine by the United Nations or any member state.
    One year ago, under Biden, the United States vetoed an otherwise-unanimous UN Security Council resolution recommending full membership for Palestine. It even claimed the International Criminal Court had no jurisdiction regarding war crimes committed from or on Palestinian territory because Palestine was not a state.
  The United States has long insisted that the only way a Palestinian state should be recognized was under terms agreed to by the Israeli government, despite the fact that the Israeli government has categorically ruled out Palestinian statehood, declared Dr Zunes…”